Tuesday, February 05, 2008
We appear to score at least one vote for Romney
The Anchoress asked us to "convince her of the merits of Mitt," and we did! Or at least helped.
Happy to be of service. And a belated thanks to the many other bloggers who linked to my endorsement post.
CWCID: Glenn Reynolds.
4 Comments:
By 
Christopher Chambers, at
Tue Feb 05, 08:13:00 PM:
I think my prince and your bane Keith Olberman put it best-- Mike Huckabee reminds people of the guy next to you in your cubicle, or your neighbor. Mitt Romney reminds people of the douchebag who laid them off or sold the company to foreign investors and then took the parachute. McCain reminds people of their stalwart, fair-dealing dads.
Based on that analysis, I can see why you are supporting Mitt. hahahahaha
By 
, at
Tue Feb 05, 08:38:00 PM:
Any guy who'd lay off that uniplegic* ass-clown Olberman has my vote.
*paralyzed from the neck up
By Christopher Chambers, at
Tue Feb 05, 11:16:00 PM:
"Locker Room?" Are you serious? Why not just use your real name--or does that term bring back "special" memories from adolescence? hahaha. That would explain the moronic rant on Keith Olberman...or cupidity for Mitt Romney.
Watch those dirty jockstaps...
By Diane Wilson, at
Wed Feb 06, 07:55:00 AM:
Whatever else there may be for or against Romney, he has an electability problem. The only primaries he's won have been "favorite son" states: Utah, Michigan, Massachusetts. All his other wins have been caucuses, and I agree with Captain Ed (among many others) who find caucuses to be very undemocratic.
Aside from proven business and executive skills, Romney, like Obama, seems to be a Rorschach candidate. Too many people read what they want to see, and what they see may have little or no relation to what Romney really stands for. And Romney seems to encourage that and pander to it.
Romney might very well be the best peacetime candidate. Unfortunately, it's not peacetime, and we're on the verge of multiple explosions in the mideast.
