Saturday, April 04, 2009
Saturday evening exploitation post
I would be doing you a disservice, or at least blowing compliance with Rule 5, if I failed to link to this massive slideshow of cheerleaders performing at every NCAA men's college basketball tournament game. Yes, it even includes a fairly impressive move by a couple of Cornell women.
Memo to the TH Teenager: This is not a basis on which to select a college. In case that was not clear.
7 Comments:
By 
, at
Sat Apr 04, 06:53:00 PM:
"Memo to the TH Teenager: This is not a basis on which to select a college "..Sometimes you just have no sense of adventure. You're such a "Dad"......and that's not a bad thing.
By 
Escort81, at
Sat Apr 04, 06:58:00 PM:
TH Teenager - I differ slightly with your male parental unit. The ratio of females to males is a legitimate factor to consider. When I entered PU in the fall of 1977, the ratio of men to women was 5:1. It was what could be referred to as "a market distortion." An even ratio is healthy.
To the extent any of those cheerleaders are actually dateable, why wouldn't that enter into the equation as a small factor?
By D.E. Cloutier, at
Sat Apr 04, 07:15:00 PM:
Look for a cheerleader from a rich, well-connected family, TH Teenager. You get no extra points in life for doing things the hard way.
By , at
Sat Apr 04, 07:20:00 PM:
I agree with Escort81. Check the male to female ratio. College would have been a whole lot less fun without women. I'm pretty sure some college haves a surplus of women these days.
By , at
Sat Apr 04, 07:22:00 PM:
Hold up! It says Texas A&M has cheerleaders. I can assure you that we do not. Aggies do not cheer.
By Eric, at
Sat Apr 04, 10:20:00 PM:
I recommend my alma mater, Columbia. Columbia + Barnard can be a favorable "market distortion".
By Foxfier, at
Sat Apr 04, 11:11:00 PM:
Need to be careful about the Male:Female ratio-- it might be because of a very strong "Wymyns Studies" program-- in which case, you probably don't want to go there if you've been cursed with a Y....
