Tuesday, May 05, 2009
The obligatory link to the "scandalous" Miss CA photo
The photo that is supposed to discredit Carrie Prejean in the eyes of her "base" is here. (Maybe, possibly, semi-NSFW, to the extent SI swimsuit issues are).
Can somebody tell me what the big deal is?
MORE (from TigerHawk): The Other McCain, in slavish devotion to Rule 5, has stems to, er, stern coverage.
13 Comments:
By Ron Russell, at Tue May 05, 04:56:00 PM:
I looked at the photos and saw nothing out of line with them. The dirt is not in the photos, but in those who show them in hope of discrediting her.
By smitty1e, at Tue May 05, 05:07:00 PM:
She's a Sarah Palin proxy.
It is politically correct to hate her.
The only way to improve matters is to discover she's Jewish.
By Escort81, at Tue May 05, 05:23:00 PM:
"The only way to improve matters is to discover she's Jewish"I guess in theory that there might be a physical, um, characteristic that would indicate a Jewish male (whose parents observed Leviticus 12:3), but I am unfamiliar with a similar marker for a female.
, at
No tramp stamp on her, so she has that going for her ...
As another TH poster stated some days ago ... can anyone name who actually won the contest? This gal is going to make a lot of money. Like Sarah, who says you can't be hot and still be a mom, or be a Christian? I'm sure the next shocker will be that she's had sex already, even though she's not married, or drank alcohol, or smoked some dope. And we'll all say ... ok, enough of her already, that dirty, racist, uncool, anti-gay-marriage slut, and memorize the name of the winner. But until then ...
Take a look and ask yourself ... that, or that Perez guy? Survey says?!
She showed less when she had the bikini on. I was expecting more, um I mean less.....darn.
By Anthony, at Tue May 05, 05:38:00 PM:
Nice picture. All this tells me are that those posting this photograph in the hopes of diminishing Ms. Prejean are themselves small, pathetic people.
And probably wouldn't look nearly as good in lingerie.
By JPMcT, at Tue May 05, 06:15:00 PM:
If anybody feels that they are inappropriately stimulated by this picture, I'd be happy to post links to pics of Hilliary Clinton, Janet Reno, Nancy Pelosi, Janeane Garafolo, Barbara Walters, Helen Thomas....et. al.
Works like saltpeter!
By joated, at Tue May 05, 06:18:00 PM:
I cewrtainly don't see what all the fuss is about. She seems to be a very fit young lady.
(BTW: Thanks a heap JPMcT! With that thought experiment of your's I'll have difficult time just getting the little guy to come out a pee, nevermind anything else.)
By Christopher Chambers, at Tue May 05, 07:59:00 PM:
I don't think that's the point at all. the point is that she's cheesecake, a bit bubbleheaded. Not a posterchild for policy debate. perhaps a bit hypocritcal and misguided as to what's "natural?" LOL.
Believe me, this nation is troubled when this girl and Perez Hilton are at the vanguard of cultural/politcal discourse. But that's not the left's fault...
By Dawnfire82, at Tue May 05, 08:42:00 PM:
, at
Honestly, if anyone actually thought that this would hurt the general support for the lady that person needs to be smacked upside the head.
I've seen more risque pictures in Target circulars.
Liberals believe that what they think conservative think is actually what conservatives think. So to them, it should be a big deal. And since it isn't a big deal to us, they hate her because she believes what the President believes.
Yeah, liberal hate doesn't make sense, but it's real.
By JPMcT, at Wed May 06, 12:45:00 AM:
"this nation is troubled when this girl and Perez Hilton are at the vanguard of cultural/politcal discourse"
...and not when "cinquo de quatro" Obama is at the vanguard???
You know, CC, being black doesn't automatically mean that you are gifted with special knowledge of what's in the heart of mankind. Black people can be perfect idiots just like anybody else...it's just that nobody can come out and say it.