Saturday, January 03, 2009
Exploitation link of the day
In keeping with its tabloid format, the Daily News has compiled a most interesting collection of red carpet photos, each of which involves some measure of, er, overexposure. I provide them to you, our readers, as a premium benefit for stopping by this blog on a Saturday night.
Probably NSFW.
6 Comments:
By 
, at
Sat Jan 03, 08:14:00 PM:
Notice to politicians, this is NOT the transparency we wish from you!
By , at
Sat Jan 03, 09:54:00 PM:
By 
SR, at
Sun Jan 04, 12:36:00 AM:
The impact is kind of lost after the first five or six.
By Gary Rosen, at
Sun Jan 04, 05:29:00 AM:
"Notice to politicians, this is NOT the transparency we wish from you!"
If you're talking about Hillary or Nancy P, it reminds me of an old Lenny Bruce routine about a blind date: "She was wearing a see-through blouse you didn't wanna see through."
By Steve M. Galbraith, at
Sun Jan 04, 11:53:00 AM:
Looks to me that the bra manufacturers will need a bailout fairly soon.
Apparently, no one is purchasing their merchandise.
Gee, whatever happened to class?
By jaed, at
Sun Jan 04, 02:46:00 PM:
This is just what happens when someone wears rayon knit in a dark color, and it's subjected to extremely bright light (as in a professional photographer's flash, not as in sunlight). Chances are good that most of these women's undies were not actually visible to anyone; they just show up in the pictures. (Sorry to disillusion anyone who was dreaming of attending red-carpet celebrity events ;-)
Remember when one of the Kerry daughters wore a black dress and a photograph made her undergear visible? Same thing. It doesn't show in person. There's no way to tell by looking in a mirror beforehand.
