<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Saturday, February 18, 2012

In which I actually agree with Client Number Nine 

Eliot Spitzer annoys his fellow liberals by arguing that Citizens United was correctly decided. He is, of course, right that the First Amendment does not qualify its prohibition on abridgment of "speech" by reference to the speaker.


0 Comments:

Post a Comment


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?