<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

Conformity at CBS 

Although I may read the Thornburgh report just for grins, I doubt very much that I will have anything to add to the hundreds of bloggers and, yes, journalists who have spent the last 22 hours examining it in detail. When all is said and done, there is but one controversy that interests me, the report's "half-hearted attempt to clear CBS of the charge of political bias." While it may very well be the case that there is no smoking-gun evidence of "political bias" narrowly construed, Power Line crisply explains how political bias, or even rank partisanship, must have infected the 60 Minutes production story:
[T]he fundamental problem that led to the downfall of 60 Minutes and, perhaps, CBS News, was the fact that no one involved in the reportorial or editorial process was a Republican or a conservative. If there had been anyone in the organization who did not share Mary Mapes's politics, who was not desperate to counteract the Swift Boat Vets and deliver the election to the Democrats, then certain obvious questions would have been asked: Where, exactly, did these documents come from? What reason is there to think that they really originated in the "personal files" of a long-dead National Guard officer, if his family has no knowledge of them? How did such modern-looking memos come to be produced in the early 1970s? How can these critical memos, allegedly by Jerry Killian, be reconciled with the glowing evaluations of Lt. Bush that Killian signed? Why haven't you interviewed General "Buck" Staudt, who is casually slandered in one of the alleged memos? Why didn't you show the memos to General Bobby Hodges, rather than reading phrases from them to him over the telephone? Isn't it a funny coincidence that these "newly discovered" memos are attributed to the one person in this story who is conveniently dead?

And so on, ad nearly infinitum. But, because virtually everyone in the CBS News organization shared Mary Mapes's politics and objective (i.e., the election of John Kerry), skeptical questions were not asked. If there is a single overriding explanation for how a fake story, intended to influence a Presidential election through the use of forged documents, could have been promulgated by 60 Minutes, it is the lack of diversity at CBS News.

2 Comments:

By Anonymous Anonymous, at Tue Jan 11, 10:02:00 PM:

You're right, enough already. This horse his beyond being ready for the glue factory. This whole affair stains CBS, that's for sure, but let's not start publicly tarring CBS for its lack of political diversity without wondering the same at Fox, the Wall Street Journal and, say, the Houston Chronicle. True, the latter three didn't have this awful thing happen to them, but it's not beyond the realm of the possible to think that the right-wing MSM will go after a Democratic President should a Democrat ever get elected President again. That doesn't make CBS blameless at all, but the right has gotten a tad self-righteous here.

Or maybe more than a tad.

The Centrist  

By Blogger TigerHawk, at Tue Jan 11, 10:09:00 PM:

That probably was my last post on the topic. RatherGate has never been more than an object of amusement to me (apart from berating a friend over the phone about it last night).

As you can see, posting in the last few days has been wide-ranging, and largely not about CBS (manatees, State of Fear, Eliot Spitzer (a constant favorite), and countless other exciting topics).

Thanks for coming back, Centrist!  

Post a Comment


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?