<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Sunday, January 09, 2005

The American Currency Exhibit and the Jackson Five 

The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has an online exhibit of American currency (paper money as opposed to coinage). Since I've got a little time to kill this evening while I watch Desperate Housewives and Boston Legal (having already done the most of the dishes and helped the TigerHawk son study for a science test), I'll put up a few samples and then send you there for the rest of it.

Here is the obverse of currency of the New Jersey colony, 1776, "the fourteenth year of the reign of His Majesty King George the Third."
 Posted by Hello

And the reverse, which declares that "'tis death to counterfeit." The next time you hear the argument that the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits capital punishment as "cruel and unusual," consider the prevailing penalties for financial crimes in the 18th century!
 Posted by Hello

The Continental Congress issued $35 bills in 1779. Too bad we don't have them today -- I often find myself in need of a denomination half way between the $20 and the $50.
 Posted by Hello

Here's the reverse:
 Posted by Hello

With the Second Bank of the United States, a $2000 bank note:
 Posted by Hello

And, of course, there are many examples of the less-than-sound currency from the Confederate States of America.
 Posted by Hello

And, finally, the very first "Jackson Five"!
 Posted by Hello

Money can be beautiful.

UPDATE: Sluggo points us toward the means to calculate the value of these amounts in current dollars. It's pretty cool. I mean, if you like that kind of thing. Which I do.

1 Comments:

By Blogger Sluggo, at Sun Jan 09, 10:13:00 PM:

35 simoleans in 1779 would be a not inconsiderable sum today. Not worth $1000, maybe, but way more than $100. Got to be a commercial bill.

Ah, here it is. Several ways of figuring it.

http://eh.net/hmit/compare/result.php?use%5B%5D=DOLLAR&use%5B%5D=GDPDEFLATION&use%5B%5D=UNSKILLED&use%5B%5D=GDPCP&use%5B%5D=NOMINALGDP&amount2=&year2=&year_result=2003&amount=35&year_source=1789

Not considering the numismatical value, of course.  

Post a Comment


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?