<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Friday, November 11, 2005

An incendiary story 

I have not weighed in on the stories about the use of incendiary munitions in Fallujah last year, the outrage du jour among opponents of the Iraq war (responses here and here, by the way), mostly because I've been busy and don't know much about it. However, I did run across this interesting discussion of incendiary munitions by Fabio, the author of the bilingual blog The Italian Version. It offers some useful perspective from a generally non-antiAmerican European.

UPDATE: Do not miss Jeff Goldstein's deconstruction of the Fallujah story.

UPDATE: Fabio has more.

2 Comments:

By Blogger Gordon Smith, at Fri Nov 11, 09:06:00 AM:

The only problem is that there are reports of civilians with their skin melted. Women, children, non-combatants who have the misfortune of living in Faluujah, a town we have to take and retake from insurgents, were exposed to it.

I think I'm not legalistic to determine whether WP's use is legal, but I know it's folly to use it in a country we invaded because they purportedly planned to use WMD on us.

We've got to stop employing tactics that fuel recruitment for our enemies. White Phosphorous, like torture, is another loss in the war of ideas.  

By Anonymous Anonymous, at Fri Nov 11, 11:58:00 AM:

hooli,

WP is primarily a screening agent. WP DOES NOT melt skin, it burns clear through it. WP DOES NOT create poison gas, or our soldiers would not use it to create smoke screen they then run through.

Yes, WP BURNS, just like thermite and other incindiaries, hot enough to melt light steel and iron. Don't you think if it can burn through steel, that it JUST MIGHT be able to burn through fabric?

You've been had, hoolie.

Hook.

Line.

Sinker.  

Post a Comment


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?